1 Daynard RA. Catastrophe theory and tobacco litigation. Tobacco Control
1994;3:59–64.
2 Daynard RA. Why tobacco litigation? Tobacco Control 2003;12:1–2.
3 Philip Morris Tobacco Company. Litigation – Primary Questions. April 11,
1995, Tobacco Documents Online, Bates No. 2048537878–2048537924.
4
Hurt RD, Robertson CR. Prying open the door to the cigarette industry’s secrets
about nicotine – The Minnesota Tobacco Trial. JAMA 1998;280:1173–81.
5 Kessler DA. The control and manipulation of nicotine in cigarettes. Tobacco
Control 1994;3:362–9.
6 Douglas CE. Taking aim at the bull’s-eye: the nicotine in tobacco products.
Tobacco Control 1998;7:215–18.
7 Kozlowski LT, O’Connor R. Cigarette filter ventilation is a defective design
because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents. Tobacco Control
2002;11(suppl I):i40–50.
8 Pauly JL, Mepani AB, Lesses JD, et al. Cigarettes with defective filters marketed
for forty years: what Philip Morris never told smokers. Tobacco Control
2002;11(suppl 1):i51–61, http://tc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/11/suppl_1/i51
9 Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly ‘‘Light’’
cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tobacco Control 2002;11(suppl
I):i18–31.
10 Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Slade J, et al. Reducing the addictiveness of
cigarettes. Tobacco Control 1998;7:281–93. http://tc.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/7/3/281
11

Farone WA. Harm reduction: 25 years later. http://tc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/11/4/287,Tobacco Control 2002;11:287–8.

12 Cummings KM, Morley, Hyland A. Failed promises of the cigarette industry
and its effect on consumer misperceptions about the health risks of smoking. http://tc.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/11/suppl_1/i110
Tobacco Control 2002;11(suppl i):i110–16.
13 Pollay RW. Propaganda, puffing and the public interest: the scientific smoke
screen for cigarettes. Public Relations Review 1990;16:27–42, http://tc.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/11/suppl_1/i1.
14 Kluger R. Ashes to ashes: America’s hundred-year cigarette war, the public
health, and the unabashed triumph of Philip Morris. New York: Alfred A
Knopf, 1996.
15 Judge Richard J. Ganucheau. Per Curiam. Gloria Scott and Deania Jackson,
on behalf of themselves and all other persons similarly situated v. The
American Tobacco Company, Inc., et al. Ad Hoc Division, Civil District Court-
Parish of Orleans, Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, State of Louisiana, Docket
No. 2003-C-1872, November 4, 2003.
16 Boeken vs. Philip Morris, Inc. Defendants’ opening statement, April 2, 2001,
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angles, Case
No. BC 226593, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/DOSBOEKEN040201.html, pp. 1–58.
17 Schwarz vs. Philip Morris, Inc. Defendants’ opening statement, February 6,
2002, Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, Case
No. 0002-01376, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/DOSSCHWARZ020602AM.html, pp 1–95 and http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/dosschwarz020602pm.html, pp 1–103.
18 Blankenship vs. Philip Morris Inc. et al. Defense opening statement,
September 10, 2001. In the Circuit Court of Ohio County, Wheeling, West
Virginia Case No. 00-C-6000, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/POSBLANKENSHIPTWO091001.html, pp.1–85.
19

Engle v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, et al. Opening statement by Philip Morris,
Inc., October 20, 1998, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for
Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22),
http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/DOSENGLE102098AM.html, pp 1–90.

20 Engle v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co, et al. Opening statement by R.J. Reynolds
Tobacco Company, October 20, 1998, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial
Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22), http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/qun05a00 l, pp 1–81.
21 Pankow JF, Tavakoli AD, Luo W, et al. Percent free base nicotine in the
tobacco smoke particulate matter of selected commercial and reference
cigarettes. Chem Res Toxicol 2003;16:1014–18.
22 Henningfield JE, Pankow JF, Garrett BE. Ammonia and other chemical base
tobacco additives and cigarette nicotine delivery: issues and research needs.
Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6:199–205.
23 Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation Research & Development. R&DBO
19-92. PM’s Global Strategy: Marlboro Product Technology, October 26,
1992, UCSF Legacy Library, Bates No. 582102369-582102606.
24 Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Ahijevych K, et al. Does menthol enhance the
addictiveness of cigarettes? An agenda for research. Nicotine Tob Res
2003;5:9–11.
25 Stanfill SB, Ashley DL. Quantification of flavor-related alkenylbenzenes in
tobacco smoke particulate by selected ion monitoring gas chromatographymass
spectrometry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
2000;48:1298–306
.
26 Wakeman H. File memo regarding Hazelton Laboratories. Philip Morris
Tobacco Company, July 22, 1963, UCSF Legacy Library, Bates No.
2022241978.
27 Hastrup JL, Cummings KM, Swedrock T, et al. Consumers’ knowledge and
beliefs about the safety of cigarette filters. Tobacco Control 2001;10:84.
28 Cummings KM, Hyland A, Giovino GA, et al. Are smokers adequately
informed about the health risks of smoking and medicinal nicotine? Nicotine
Tob Res 2004;6(suppl 3):S333–40
.
29 Trial testimony of David Eugene Townsend, PhD, toxicologist at R. J.
Reynolds Tobacco Company in Engle vs. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company,
et al. March 1, 1999, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade
County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22), http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/townsendd030199.html
, pp 1–128.
30 Deposition testimony of Bernard Scott Appleton, toxicologist at Brown &
Williamson Tobacco Company, in Engle vs. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company,
et al. December 11, 1997, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for
Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22), http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/appletonb121197.html
, pp 1–167.
31 Trial testimony of Richard Allen Carchman, PhD, Director Research and
Development at Philip Morris Inc. in Boeken vs. Phillip Morris Superior Court
of the State of California for the County of Los Angles, Case No. BC 226593,
May 7 & 8, 2001, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
carchmanr050701am.htm
l, pp 1–109, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
carchmanr050701pm.html
, pp 1–82, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
carchmanr050801.html
, pp 1–63.
32 Trial testimony of William Anthony Farone, PhD. former Director of Applied
Research at Philip Morris (1976–82), in Engle vs. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company, November 17–18, 1998, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit
in and for Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22), http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/faronew111798am.htm
l, 1-76, http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/faronew111798pm.html
, 1-93, http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/faronew111898am.html
, 1-125, http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/faronew111898pm.html
, 1-102.
33 Trial testimony of William Anthony Farone, PhD. former Director of Applied
Research at Philip Morris (1976–82), in Boeken vs. Phillip Morris Superior
Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angles, Case No. BC
226593, April 3 & 4, 2001, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
faronewor040301.htm
l, pp 1–76, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
faronewor040301am.html
, pp 1–108, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
faronewor040301pm.html
, pp 1–48.
34

Trial testimony of Ian L. Uydess, PhD, former research scientist at Philip
Morris (1979–89), in Engle vs. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al.,
November 23–24, 1998, Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for
Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22), http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/uydessi112398.html, 1-186,http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/uydessi112498pm.html, 1-144.

35 Trial testimony of Paul Camille Mele, PhD, research scientist who worked
with Dr. Victor DeNoble at Philip Morris (1981–84), in Engle vs. R.J.
Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al., December 15 and 21, 1998, Circuit Court
of the 11th Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-
08273 CA (22), http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/melep121598.html, 1-
148, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/melep122198am.html, 1-75,
http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/melep122198pm.html, 1-126.
36 Trial testimony of Jeffrey Wigand, PhD. former Vice President for Research
and Development for Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation (1988–93),
in Falise vs. American Tobacco Company, et. al. United States District Court
for the Eastern Division of New York, Civil Action No. 99 CV7392, December
11 & 12, 2000, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/Wigandj121100.html,
1-193, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/Wigandj121200.html, 1-225.
37

Deposition of Victor DeNoble, PhD, former Associate Senior Scientist in
behavioral research at Philip Morris (1980–84), in Sackman vs. Liggett
Group, Inc., United States District Court for the Eastern Division of New York,
Civil Action No. 93 CV 4155, October 9, 1995, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/denoblev100995.html, 1-210.

38

Trial testimony of Jack Henningfield, PhD, Blankenship vs. Philip Morris Inc.
et al. Circuit Court of Ohio County, Wheeling, West Virginia Case No. 00-C-
6000, September 17, 2001, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/henningfieldj091701am.html, 1-152, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/henningfieldJ091701pm.html, 1-152.

39 Trial testimony of Neal Leon Benowitz, MD, in Boeken vs. Phillip Morris
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angles, Case
No. BC 226593, April 10, 2001, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/
benowitzn041001.htm
l, pp1–64.
40 Trial testimony of David Michael Burns, MD, in Schwarz vs. Philip Morris Inc.
Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Multnomah, Case No.
0002-01376, February 12 & 13, 2002, http://tobaccodocuments.org/
datta/burnsm021202amvol1.html
, pp 1–77, http://tobaccodocuments.org/
datta/burnsm021202pm.html
, pp 1–97, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/burnsm021302.html,%20pp%201–104
41 Trial testimony of Ilan Alan Feingold, MD, in Allen vs. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco
Company and Philip Morris, Inc., United States District Court Southern District
of Florida, Miami Division, Case No. 01-4319, February 11, 2003, http://
tobaccodocuments.org/datta/feingoldi021103.html
, pp 1–109.
42 Trial testimony of Ronald Mark Davis, MD, in Whiteley vs. Raybetos-
Manhattan, Inc. et al, Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
City and County of San Francisco, Case No. 303184, January 19–21, 2000,
http://tdo.roswellpark.org/datta/DAVISR011900.html, pp 1–137, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/davisr012000.html, pp 1–141, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/davisr012100.html, pp 1–126.
43 Trial testimony of Kenneth Michael Cummings, PhD, MPH, in Engle vs. R.J.
Reynolds Tobacco Company et al., Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in
and for Dade County, Florida, Case No. 94-08273 CA (22), June 1 and 5,
2000, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/cummingsk060100.html, pp 1–
131, http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta/cummingsk060500.html, pp 1–
94.